Tuesday, August 24, 2010

"Dad, Can I Have Some Money, I Need..."

I’m willing to bet that nearly every parent has heard these words at one time or another, especially as the kids head back to school. Unfortunately for my girls, when they recently asked this question, I was admiring my newest acquisition, a freshly minted One Hundred Trillion Dollar note from Zimbabwe (The largest denomination note ever printed with the zero’s on it, all 14 of them). I had just paid $8 dollars for it on Amazon.

I asked the girls what they thought this “money” was worth?  My youngest eyes got a little wider as she asked, “Is that like real?” I said, “it is very real, what do you think it is worth?” My oldest daughter, having played these games a few too many times, rolled her eyes and said, “whatever I can get for it.” Correct, money is only worth what you can purchase with it. You see the poor people of Zimbabwe lived in a war torn country, with a very corrupt government, that just kept on printing more and more money to pay for things. Eventually they printed so much money that it wasn’t worth anything.

Prices for basic goods, like milk and bread, were doubling every day. Soon the sellers of these goods wouldn’t put them out on the shelves, and instead of accept the government’s paper money, people would just trade goods with each other.  My $100 trillion dollar note was introduced in January 2009, and just two weeks later Zimbabwe abandoned their currency and converted their economy to US dollars.

So what’s my $100 trillion dollar note worth; eight dollars to a currency collector, or zero to someone trying to spend it.

“That’s pretty cool Dad, but we still need some “real” money.”

 “Real money” I said, “you mean like this?” Pulling out a fresh One Hundred Dollar bill.

“Yeah, that will do,” they said, while reaching for it. “Woo not so fast, is this “real” money?” “Yeah” they said in unison. “How do you know”, I asked? “Because, if we take it to the store we can buy $100 worth of stuff,” Rachel answered. “True enough,” I said, “but why is it worth that?” “Because that’s what the government says it’s worth”, says Lauren. 

“Well done, but why is the US note worth $100, and the Zimbabwe note worthless?”

I could tell that they were tiring of my questioning so I answered this one, “because we trust the US government, and no one trusts the Zimbabwe government, at least for now.” “You see all money today is based on faith, faith in others to accept it, and faith that the issuing government won’t devalue it.”

“Wow that’s like scary, you mean its like all just based on trust and nothing real?” “That’s right, but it wasn’t always that way, money used to be backed by stuff like gold or silver, this faith based money is a rather new phenomenon.”

“Well, we still need some money Dad.”

“OK, OK, but first let me tell you a little story about money.”

A long, long time ago (when I was your age), currencies were backed by gold. In other words, you could exchange your paper for an equal amount of the metal. This was the way the world worked, in varying degrees, for thousands of years. Paper money, or promissory notes, could be exchanged for gold or silver. And in many cases coins were actually made out of precious metals. This gold backed currency system worked well during most of history. When governments usually got into trouble it was because they were printing more currency than they had gold to back it. This was generally done to support their military endeavors. 

Our US system started to unravel in earnest during the 1960's when an excessive amount of money was printed to help finance the Vietnam war and our struggling economy. At the time the price of gold was fixed at $35 per ounce, and any government could go to the gold window and exchange their dollars for gold. During this period foreign governments accumulated large quantities of dollars, far exceeding our governments stock of gold. The proverbial (you know what) hit the fan in August 1971, when the British ambassador turned up at the Treasury Department to request that $3 billion US dollars be converted into gold. The very next week President Nixon announced to the world that the gold window was now closed and the United States was no longer on the gold standard. Obviously the dollar weakened versus other currencies, and inflation shot skyward. This was a momentous step in the history of international economics. From that day forward the US dollar would be backed by faith and faith alone. 

The beauty of this faith based system was that governments could print and spend as long as they were able to find other governments to buy their debt. They were no longer constrained by the amount of gold mined annually. This unconstrained money supply is very appealing to politicians trying to spend enough to make good on their promises to voters. It didn't take long for all the worlds governments to quickly follow the US's lead in abandoning their gold standards. Today we live in a fiat based world where our leaders have decreed that currency is worth what they say it is, as long as everyone continues to believe in what they are saying. Occasionally it doesn't work and a country will need to default on their debts and devalue their currency. Zimbabwe was an extreme example, but Argentina, Brazil, Russia, and Mexico are all recent examples (Greece and others soon to follow.)

We've also seen periods where certain currencies appreciate versus others, and periods where currencies weaken. Since 1973 the Fed's Major Currencies Dollar Index (the US dollar versus the worlds major currencies) has declined by 27%, and the dollar is down 45% from its 1985 peak. And just this week the US dollar set a new 15 year low versus the Japanese Yen. Fortunately for the United States, many of our major trading partners have been as prolific as the US in promising and printing (also known as competitive devaluations), and therefore the dollar hasn't declined even more. But hows that fiat dollar doing versus it's old protector gold? Since 1973 gold has risen from $35 an ounce to $1,200 an ounce for a gain of 3,328%. Measured in gold the value of one dollar has declined by 97%! They didn't call President Nixon "Tricky Dick" for nothing!

Now most people think of gold as an inflation hedge, and prior to 1973 that was generally the case. But since 1973, gold has generally moved in the opposite direction of the US dollar. In fact, gold has a correlation to inflation of just 0.08. A perfectly positive correlation would be 1.00, while a minus-1.00 means that two assets move in perfect opposition. A near zero reading means that gold and inflation mostly ignore each other.

The correlation between gold and the dollar is another matter. Since that infamous day in 1973, the correlation between gold and the dollar is a high negative correlation of minus-0.65. This means that when the dollar weakens gold strengthens, and when the dollar rallies gold retreats. Many wrongly believe that since the US is on the verge of deflation, and there is no inflation in sight, then gold should be trading lower. That's simply not the fact, gold will move in the opposite direction of the dollar. 
 
As a portfolio manager, or more appropriately a risk manager, my job is to protect my clients wealth. Since I and my clients all live in the US, own houses denominated in dollars, get paid in dollars, and have most of our investments denominated in dollars, our biggest risk is the continued devaluation of the dollar. And a real scary risk is the potential that the world no longer believes in the value of the US dollar and we see hyperinflation and a currency collapse. Now don't freak, no one knows if this will happen, but it is a risk (see Zimbabwe dollar at the top). So in order to hedge this risk we own gold. 

Gold is the ultimate fiat currency hedge. It's an insurance policy against government mismanagement.
 
 "Great story Dad, can we have some gold?"

Be careful out there,

Chris Wiles

For prior Rockhaven Views visit:

This article contains the current opinions of the author but not necessarily those of the Rockhaven Capital Management.  The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. This article is distributed for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed.
    

Friday, August 20, 2010

Live And Let Die

"When you were young
And your heart was an open book
You used to say live and let live
(You know you did, you know you did, you know you did)

But if this ever changin' world
In which we live in
Makes you give in and cry
Say live and let die"

"Live And Let Die" by Paul McCartney & Wings

I was so fortunate to join a friend this week for the Paul McCartney concert at the new Consol Energy Center (The Coal Barn). This was the first time I had ever seen Sir Paul and it was really surreal. It was like watching history, live. The show and the Center were fabulous, but this trip down memory lane really got me thinking about how things have progressed from the '60's to today. In the '60's we had race riots, and Vietnam, but there was also a pervasive feeling that we could overcome these issues. In the '70's Nixon abolished the gold standard, we had some serious inflation and a couple of brutal recessions, but again there was that sense that eventually things would get better. Finally the '80's came and ushered in a couple of decades of prosperity. Inflation was broken (thanks Paul Volcker), technology lead to a boom in productivity, and the government piled on the debt to make sure that the "American Dream" would live on.
You know the "American Dream" right? That's the dream that even though times may be tough, if you work hard, at least your children will have a better life than you. 
I'm not sure exactly how this changed, but somewhere in the last couple of decades, the belief in hard work to better your future was supplanted by the belief that the government will take care of our future. And I give our friends in Washington credit, they tried. They borrowed and promised, and borrowed and promised, and for a while we all felt pretty good. 
I can't help thinking of this Baby Boom generation, going through the decades; living, loving, fighting, working, saving, growing a little heavier and more than a bit worried. Have we moved from "live and let live" to "live and let die?" In some ways I think we have. Many of us realize that our prolific past, like our waste lines, needs to be cut. We're doing it personally, and we're starting a movement to see that our elected officials do it too. 
It's fascinating to watch governments around the developed world attack their weight (debt) problems. In Europe we see varying degrees of dieting going on (also known as austerity). Some countries just need to lose a few pounds (France), while others are clearly obese (Greece). Some countries just need to make a few lifestyle changes, while others may need more drastic measures, such as gastric bypass surgery (default and debt restructuring). 
In the US we are stuck in the middle, while some of us clearly recognize our weight problem, many of us still think that it's OK to be pleasingly plump. There is clearly a large contingent in DC that believes that we can continue our prolific ways, but I believe that their days are numbered. That's the beauty of this country, as Sir John said, "What does it matter to ya, when ya got a job to do. Ya got to do it well, you got to give the other fella hell."

Investment Implications:
We did a few trades this week, that were surprisingly all buys. The reason I say surprisingly is that the general mood out there is definitely bearish. But, in the past couple of weeks we've had the Fed come out and state as plainly as possible that they will have a Zero Interest Rate Policy for as long as they can see. And since the economy is not showing much in the way of improvement they will soon begin QEII (Quantitative Easing II), in which they will purchase Treasury securities. In other words they are very concerned that we are slipping into a double dip recession (maybe we never really got out of the first one) and potential deflation. This caused a significant rally in Treasuries and just about every other interest paying security. Ten year Treasuries are at 2.6% and two year Treasuries are at 0.50%. Mortgage rates are also at record lows. So just about every fixed income security we own has moved to bullish territory and we are nearly at maximum weight in fixed income.
This caused us to add to WIP (SPDR Int'l Government Bond TIPS).
We also added to both US REIT's (VNQ Vanguard MSCI REIT Index) and International REIT's (IFGL iShares FTSE/NAREIT Global-ex US), which are sought after for their high yields.

The other event that has been taking place of late has been the run-up in most agriculture commodities. You're probably aware of the draught and fires in Russia, and the massive flooding in Pakistan. These events as well as continued demand growth from emerging markets has caused some severe price shocks in wheat, corn and soy. On top of this fundamental demand we also have the hostile takeover attempt of Potash that is causing all fertilizer stocks to appreciate.
This has triggered buying in DBC (PowerShares DB Commodity Index), MOO (Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF), and CRBQ (TR/J CRB Global Commodity Index).

Last but not least we have had EFA (iShares MSCI EAFE Index), our core international equity holding, move from bearish to neutral.

Overall our cash equivalents dropped from 27.5% to 16.5%.

Longer term I remain generally bearish, but I remember the old saying, 
"Don't fight the Fed, and don't fight the tape."
 
Kyle Bass Interview:
This is an excellent two part video interview with Hayman Capital's Kyle Bass, who called and profited handsomely from the subprime implosion.
His main thrust is that he expects several sovereign nation defaults (and highlights Japan), basically when a nations debt service exceeds its revenue...game over.
It is not bullish, but it is definitely worth listening too.



Hedge Fund Manager Pops a Brewski, Hits the Emergency Exit Button, and Goes Down the Slide:
Steeler fan, and hedge fund manager Stanley Druckenmiller has decided to retire after a 30 year career of managing other peoples money. To say his career was successful would be a gross understatement. After working here in Pittsburgh at PNC, he borrowed $75,000 to start a hedge fund, and is now retiring with a fortune of about $2.8 billion. His 100 investors did nearly as well since Duquesne Capital Management averaged 30% annually since 1986. 
I've met Stan at a couple of his awesome Steeler tailgate parties over the years, we weren't close, but he was always a very welcoming and gracious host.
This business takes a toll on you and it's not surprising to see someone as driven as Stan take a step back. Early word is that most of his employees here in Upper St. Clair, as well as in NYC, will either work for his new family office (they still have Stan's $2.8 billion to run), or continue managing client assets in their new hedge funds.
Cheers to you Stan, can't wait to catchup at the Steelers opener. Here's his exit letter to clients:

"As many of you may be aware, this is Duquesne Capital Management’s 30th year of doing business. During that time, I have often marveled that there can hardly have been a luckier person in the world: I have gotten to do what I love, I have had the pleasure of delivering favorable results to clients (who have become dear friends) which has helped them to achieve their goals, and both Duquesne and its clients have been well rewarded in the process.
While I knew from the outset how much I enjoyed what I was doing, I had no idea that the biggest reward for me would come from the experience of meeting and getting to know so many wonderful people who became clients and friends. The biggest surprise was that I would be well compensated for doing something that has been so rewarding in other respects. I need to express to you my gratitude for the trust you placed in me, and for the joy and satisfaction I have had from helping so many clients achieve their aspirations – this has simply yielded a pleasure for me that I am not sure any person deserves, and which easily transcends monetary compensation.
After much self reflection, I have decided to retire from managing client funds and I wanted to give you prompt notice of my intentions and explain the reasons for this. I have had to recognize that competing in the markets over such a long timeframe imposes heavy personal costs. While the joy of winning for clients is immense, for me the disappointment of each interim drawdown over the years has taken a cumulative toll that I cannot continue to sustain. This is true even though to date we have delivered an unbroken record of positive annual performance which I hope will continue for 2010 as well. And while our clients were certainly pleased that we achieved positive results for 2008 and 2009 in a challenging environment, as you may have surmised I was dissatisfied with those results because they did not match my own, internal long-term standard.
You may remember that I chose to leave Soros Fund Management ten years ago because the challenge of managing an enormous amount of capital was having a clear impact on my ability to perform, as well as my state of being. Unfortunately, as Duquesne has grown, these factors have again emerged. I continue to care deeply about performing for our clients, and the stress of performing in a way that I consider to be disappointing – even if you do not share that view – persists in exacting a high emotional toll, with the result that I have concluded that this change is necessary.
We will be providing you with further information as to the timing and other details of this process. I will also be hosting meetings in Pittsburgh and New York in the upcoming weeks to express my gratitude to you face to face, and to answer any questions you may have, and I will be forwarding to you shortly the schedule for those meetings.
It has been a wonderful experience and I am deeply grateful for your trust over the years. I look forward to this change in my activities with excitement and anticipation and to continuing our relationship in a more personal way."

With very warm regards,
Stanley F. Druckenmiller


China Overtakes Japan As Worlds 2nd Largest Economy:
There has been some news this week about China overtaking Japan as the worlds second largest economy, and it is only a matter of time before they supplant the US.
The reason for this is quite evident in this excellent chart from the Economist. 
For centuries China and India had the worlds largest economies because they had the worlds largest populations and economies were largely agrarian.
The industrial revolution turned that math on its head, with the US and Europe taking the lead. But now that China and India are becoming more industrialized they will again become the worlds largest economies.
Simple math. 



Keep the faith and remember what John Wayne so famously stated, "Well Pilgrim, you gonna just lie there and bleed, or you going to get up?"

Be careful out there,

Chris Wiles

For prior Rockhaven Views visit:

This article contains the current opinions of the author but not necessarily those of the Rockhaven Capital Management.  The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. This article is distributed for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed.
    

Friday, August 13, 2010

Supermodel Portfolio

Cheeseburger in paradise.
Heaven on earth with an onion slice.
Not too particular, not too precise.
I'm just a cheeseburger in paradise.

Cheeseburger in Paradise by Jimmy Buffett

Sometimes you need to get your hands dirty in the name of research. You know, down in the trenches, sand under the finger nails, old fashioned research. Well, that's exactly what I've been doing the last couple of weeks. I have been trying to construct a diversified high-yielding portfolio -- a "Supermodel" Portfolio. While our Global Tactical Asset Allocation Model Portfolio is our core all-weather portfolio, several of my clients, myself included, have expressed a desire, no a need, for more income. In a world where the Federal Reserve is battling the specter deflation via ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policy), many investors are seeking income alternatives other than collecting bottles and cans along the roadside. So after extensive Supermodel research I determined that I would have to make an on-site visit to the home of the legendary S.I. Supermodel Reunion ... the pink sand beaches of Harbour Island. After all, if you're going to construct a "Supermodel" Portfolio, what better place could there be for inspiration than the site chosen for one of the most famous supermodel photo-shoots ever. 


First logistics.
Harbour Island (aka Briland) is a speck of an island (3.5 miles long by 1.5 miles wide) in the Bahamas off of the coast of Eleuthera. Getting there from Pittsburgh entails a flight to Charlotte (like every flight out of the 'burgh), a connection to Nassau, another connection (via a much smaller plane) to North Eleuthera, a short taxi ride, and then a water taxi from Eleuthera to Harbour Island. There are no airports on Harbour Island, so even those of you with access to private jets will have to slum it a bit with the common folk on the water taxi. Of course those of you with private yachts can sail right over. 
The entire island is surrounded by a treacherous reef known as the "Devil's Backbone". Even experienced captains stop at Eleuthera to pick up a local pilot to help them navigate safely through. The beauty of this treacherous reef is that "No" cruise ships visit the island ... and that's exactly how the locals like it. In fact the locals are very protective. Development has been strictly limited and there are only a handful of boutique hotels and houses for rent. Idyllic is an apt description.
Harbour Island is one of the oldest settlements in the Bahamas, originally occupied by the Lucayan Indians who were enslaved by the Spanish in the 1500's. English puritans settled on the island in the 1600's and many English Loyalists moved there after the American Revolutionary War. Today the largest inhabitants seem to be free-range chickens and in particular roosters (my favorite t-shirt was "So Many Roosters, So Few Recipes). The architecture is very reminiscent of a quaint New England village. The Island is world renowned for its pink sand beach which is 3 miles long and 50 to 100 feet wide, it is simply the most beautiful beach that I have ever seen. Also, because of the reef right off shore, the water is exceptionally clear and calm, a snorkeling and swimming paradise.


Traveling on the island is almost entirely done via golf carts. Our first morning I ventured out in search of coffee and breakfast while the girls slept. I found out that the place for breakfast on the island is Arthur's Bakery. While Arthur's has a great selection of breakfast and lunch items (try the guava turnovers, lime tarts, and lobster omelets), it is also news and gossip central. Arthur is the quintessential island entrepreneur, and was a font of information on island happenings as well as the Bahamas in general.
While chatting with Arthur I found out that the biggest investment news in the Bahamas over the last several years is very similar to the investment news in most emerging markets...the Chinese. The Chinese have purchased and operate the airport in Freeport, and they've also built the largest container port in the world in Freeport. They are buying resorts and farm land throughout the Bahamas, and have filed for over 6,000 Chinese work permits. Arthur said that most people are enthusiastic to have the Chinese money entering the islands but are very leery of Chinese workers displacing Bahamian workers. He said that the Chinese are now the "go to" source for investment funds in the Bahamas.

Back to our "Supermodel". The keys to building a supermodel investment portfolio are very similar to those used to build a supermodel photo spread. Find some very appealing assets that will help you achieve your goals, while making sure you have enough diversity. As for our "Supermodel" High-Yield Portfolio I searched for a variety of high-yielding securities that would meet my goal of high current income while hopefully not being perfectly correlated to one another. My broad areas of interest fell into the following categories: High Yield Corporate Bonds, Mortgage REIT's, Royalty Trust's, Master Limited Partnerships, and Convertible Securities. Using individual securities, ETF's, and closed-end funds I was able to construct a fairly diversified portfolio with a current yield of about 9%. OK, 9% current yield in a world of 2.7% ten year Treasuries sounds appealing, but it should also send off warning alarms. Obviously yields that high mean that you are taking risk. Higher yielding corporate bonds and convertibles are lower quality securities, and lower quality securities are more volatile than higher quality securities. REIT's,  MLP's, and Royalty Trusts generally have higher yields because of various tax advantages at the corporate level, these tax advantages at the corporate level may increase tax complexity for individual investors. In other words this portfolio is not for the faint of heart, nor should it be used for a large portion of your assets (I'm starting with less than 5%). High reward, high risk, what would you expect from a "Supermodel"
If you think this "Supermodel" may be of interest to you please give me a call.

Overall, it was a fabulous couple of weeks of research. Rested, recharged, a few pounds heavier (Jimmy Buffett frequents Ma Ruby's for her Cheeseburger in Paradise whenever his yacht is in the area), with a new "Supermodel" Portfolio tucked under my arm. 




Be careful out there,




Chris Wiles

For prior Rockhaven Views visit:




This article contains the current opinions of the author but not necessarily those of the Rockhaven Capital Management.  The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. This article is distributed for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed.