Thursday, March 31, 2011

Ooooh That Smell


Ooooh that smell
Can't you smell that smell
Ooooh that smell
The smell of death surrounds you 


This wonderfully lovable skunk, Pepe Le Pew, was brought to our attention today by Bill Gross of PIMCO. I've referenced a lot of Bill's work on these pages and will continue to do so, at least until I disagree with him. Bill's April missive is especially noteworthy. In it he compares Pepe's smell and sweet words to the smell and sweet words emanating from the halls of Congress. Below are some highlights, but I recommend reading the entire note here: http://www.pimco.com/Pages/Skunked.aspx    PDF 
Bill does an excellent job laying bare our massive deficits and this line sums it up rather nicely, “I sit before you as a representative of a $1.2 trillion money manager, historically bond oriented, that has been selling Treasuries because they have little value within the context of a $75 trillion total debt burden." He goes on to say, "Unless entitlements are substantially reformed, I am confident that this country will default on its debt; not in conventional ways, but by picking the pocket of savers via a combination of less observable, yet historically verifiable policies – inflation, currency devaluation and low to negative real interest rates." And finally he goes on to talk about our only way out of this smelly mess, "The only way out of the dilemma, absent very large entitlement cuts, is to default in one (or a combination) of four ways: 1) outright via contractual abrogation – surely unthinkable, 2) surreptitiously via accelerating and unexpectedly higher inflation – likely but not significant in its impact, 3) deceptively via a declining dollar– currently taking place right in front of our noses, and 4) stealthily via policy rates and Treasury yields far below historical levels – paying savers less on their money and hoping they won’t complain."

This is it, the unvarnished truth. "Can't you smell that smell." This is why you must look to diversify your assets globally, via stocks, bonds, real estate, commodities, currencies and gold. 

Best first quarter since 1998: 

I know it seems hard to believe; with surging prices for food and oil, uprisings and wars in the Middle East, earthquakes, tsunamis, nuclear fallout, and the continuing fiscal solvency issues in Europe, but the S&P 500 is UP 5.5% so far this year. This is even more unbelievable when you consider that the S&P 500 was actually negative year-to-date on March 16. Thats right, we are up over 6% since March 16!! 
Clearly the biggest reason for this strong upward bias in stocks continues to be the Feds Zero Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP), which is forcing investors out of cash and into anything else with the promise of a positive return. QE2 (Quantitative Easing), where the Fed actively prints money to buy our own debt, has been going on since last fall and is a major reason for this equity market melt-up. QE2 is scheduled to end in June, and while there is some talk of a new QE3 taking its place, it appears unlikely unless the economy really swoons. But maybe QE3 has already happened, at least on a global basis. The Bank of Japan has spewed the equivalent of their own QE2 -- in just three days! Yes, the world is awash in liquidity, and it is finding a home in stocks and other risk assets.
Historically when there was turmoil in the world money would flow to the US dollar and Treasury bonds, that is not the case today. No, today with the Fed forcing the dollar lower, the flight-to-safety trade is into US stocks and gold.

Mini Oracle Of Omaha's Sure Fire Way To Riches:

We've always known that one of the strengths of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway was their ability to see and participate in deals that the rest of us mere humans weren't privy too. It appears that the mini Oracle, David Sokol, was doing his boss one better. It was revealed last night that Mr. Sokol bought, for his own account, a mere $10 million worth of Lubrizol after researching it for his boss, and was then surprised that his boss, Mr. Buffett, actually went out and bought the entire company. Surprised that even after setting up a meeting with Lubrizol's management, and recommending the stock to Mr. Buffett, that he actually bought it.
Who is David Sokol? Mr. Sokol spent a long career as the founder of NetJets, subsequently sold it to Berkshire Hathaway, worked along side of Mr. Buffett, and was on the very short list to succeed Mr. Buffett. Instead he decided to front run his boss and pocket a quick $3 million by buying Lubrizol before Buffett did. The scary thing is that neither he nor Mr. Buffett sees anything wrong with that. 
Wow, not only was this event shocking, but Mr. Sokol's interview on CNBC ( Sokol’s Surprise ) and his total lack of understanding of fiduciary duty was even more shocking. When asked if he would change anything after seeing the hooplah that it caused he said, "I guess knowing today what I know, what I would do differently is that I would have never mentioned it to Warren, and just made my own investment and left it alone." Doesn't Mr. Sokol work for Berkshire Hathaway, and doesn't he have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interest's of his shareholders? He goes on to say, "You can't -- or at least I don't think you can tell executives to not invest their family's capital in a company that Berkshire had no interest, or even knowledge of, and somehow police that. The only thing you can do is just say if you invest your own money, don't ever mention it to anyone at Berkshire." Ahhhh, yes you can! In fact that is exactly what is done at every investment company that I know of. For the last couple of decades I was almost completely prohibited from purchasing any individual stocks. If we liked a company enough to buy it then we should buy it in our funds. If we wanted to invest our families money then we should invest it in our funds. The fiduciary duty lies with your clients/shareholders, not with your family. If you want to invest for your family then don't work for someone else.
Don't worry about Mr. Sokol, or Mr. Buffett, the SEC will turn a blind eye. "Can't you smell that smell."

Be careful out there, and keep the lights on,

Chris Wiles, CFA
412-260-7917


For prior Rockhaven Views visit:

This article contains the current opinions of the author but not necessarily those of the Rockhaven Capital Management.  The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. This article is distributed for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed.






This is over ten years old and still relevant: 


Friday, March 25, 2011

Nothing Really Matters


Nothing really matters, Anyone can see
Nothing really matters
Nothing really matters to me 

Watch the classic here: Queen - Bohemian Rhapsody

Lately, Mr. Market has been doing it's best imitation of Freddie Mercury..."Nothing really matters to me." The relentless march higher in the face of rising inflation, oil over $105/barrel, another strong leg down in housing, a new war with Libya, growing unrest in the Middle East, Portugal joining its fellow PIIGS Greece and Ireland at the bailout trough, continued nuclear fallout in Japan, and runaway deficits here in the good ole USA. I know bull markets like to climb a wall of worry, but this wall does appear a bit steep. Nevertheless, the S&P 500 is up about 4.5% from its March 16 low.

It's true that the worst thing for the market is surprises, so maybe all of the above worries are just old news that Mr. Market can ignore. Makes me wonder what kind of surprise would actually take the market lower?

One explanation for the upward grinding equity market, is that it is still the best game in town. With zero returns on cash (actually negative after inflation), the threat of rising interest rates, falling home prices, and the decline of the dollar, equities are relatively attractive. Corporate earnings continue to be rather robust, especially in those companies with pricing power. 

So while I may have worries about that wall of worry, all of my equity and commodity indicators still have me fully invested and participating in the rally. 

I recently prepared this Asset Allocation Chart for a client to show how our weightings have changed since last May. As you can see, we've been at maximum weight in equities and commodities since last August (coinciding with the Feds QE2). Cash and currencies have grown to 17.5% of holdings, mostly at the expense of fixed income.

Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? 
Caught in a landslide, No escape from reality 

To many of us, the stock market and Washington seem far removed from reality. Reality for us is rather simple. We know what we pay for things we consume, and we know that amount is increasing. We know that nuclear fallout is dangerous. We know that fake economic growth created by printing money is illusory. We know that massive deficits are paid for with a lower standard of living. And we know that war is counterproductive to peace and stability.

Unfortunately, those in power seem to be living in a fantasy.

War
What is it good for


A few words on our new war. Oops, I'm supposed to call it a "kinetic military action," WTF.

I was fortunate that I grew up just a tad too young to be drafted into the Vietnam War, but I do remember how war was on TV every night. Last week when we attacked Libya, I had my 11 year old daughter Rachel come over and watch the news with me. She was acting a bit callous, even for her, and I said, "This is important." She looked at me and asked, "What's so different about this war?" That's when it hit me, she's now grown up with war on the nightly news for her entire life...Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Libya. I didn't have a good answer for her.

I've clearly gotten more cynical as I've aged. I used to believe that it is OK to use our military power for good, for humanitarian efforts, for the spread of freedom, and I guess I still would if I ever saw an instance of it happening. We go to war only if it is to our economic benefit. Sure we try and wrap those wars in the cloak of humanitarian aid, but the reality is we only send troops into harms way if it will have a positive economic impact. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but let's just call a spade a spade. 

Why would we attack Libya when an even larger humanitarian travesty is playing out just south of there in the Ivory Coast. A democratically elected leader is not being allowed to take office, and the defeated leader is killing freedom fighters at will, resulting in 300,000 - 400,000 refugees fleeing the country. Could it be that Libya has far more oil reserves than the Ivory Coast?

The only reason we are involved in Libya is that we need oil, they have oil, and hopefully a newly installed government will be sympathetic to our interests. Just a few short months ago we thought that crazy Colonel Gaddafi was coming around to our way of thinking, allowing western oil companies to drill off of his coastline, but those pesky freedom fighters got in the way. Now its time for Gaddafi to go. 

Hypocrites? Not really. We and our Western allies will support any regime, when it is in our economic interest to do so, see Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain. And unfortunately we will mostly ignore humanitarian crimes when there is little economic benefit, see Ivory Coast, Somalia, Darfur, China, etc.

I guess I'll have to have Rachel listen to some Springsteen. 

A "Real" Look At Housing: 

I believe it is critically important to look at "real" (inflation adjusted) returns instead of nominal returns. Real returns actually let you know if your standard of living is increasing or falling behind. This great chart, by VisualizingEconomics.com, shows 120 years of home prices here in the US. As you can see, a $10,000 house in 1890 would be worth just about the same amount in 2010, when adjusted for inflation. In other words, a house is a place to live, it is not a productive asset. Just because that $10,000 house in 1890 would be worth $350,000 today doesn't mean your standard of living has increased, it only means the value of a dollar has decreased.



Be careful out there, and keep the lights on,

Chris Wiles, CFA
412-260-7917


For prior Rockhaven Views visit:

This article contains the current opinions of the author but not necessarily those of the Rockhaven Capital Management.  The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. This article is distributed for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed.

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Things I Think I Think



Last night, after the bombing of Libya and the bombing of Pitt, I needed a little escapism, something mindless. So after finishing off what was left of my bottle of wine I settled in to watch some shlocky action movie into the wee hours of the morning. The movie was the typical good guy, bad guy battle; like Rocky without the great acting. You know the storyline; the good guy is getting beaten mercilessly and incessantly by the bad guy, but then, just when the bad guy is feeling a little tired but triumphant, the good guy scrapes himself up from the floor, gives a bloody smirk, and says, "Is that all you've got?" (Think Muhammad Ali and the rope-a-dope). At that point the camera pans over to the face of the bad guy where we can see the surge of doubt and panic sweep over him. The bad guy realizes he has given all he's got and that now he is vulnerable, as the good guy has tapped into a reserve of hidden strength. At this point the tide has turned and the good guy rout begins, usually resulting in winning the heart of the fair maiden.
 
Of course, in my sad little universe, I thought of the bloody battle between Wall Street's Bull's and Bear's. The Bear's have thrown everything at this market, including the kitchen sink. In less than a month we've seen skyrocketing fuel and food prices, destabilizing political and social unrest in the Middle East, a new war with Libya, the fourth most powerful earthquake ever, a tsunami, nuclear fallout, and what appears to be another massive oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico. Our hero, the S&P 500, has been bloodied and is down 7% from it's recent high, but appears to be shaking off the Bear's attack and asking, "Is that all you've got?" 

Just a 7% correction after all of that? Considering all that has been thrown at it, the market has been surprisingly resilient. Maybe it is the fact that the US economy is actually improving, slowly, but positively. The New York and Philadelphia Fed gauges registered the most strength since the 1970s, unemployment claims are falling, private employment is improving, and corporations are doing rather well. Those of you who know me know that I am always looking out for what could go wrong, and believe me there is plenty, but maybe just maybe some things are going right. Maybe the resilience of this market is totally illusory, built on the artificial support of the Fed. But maybe, Mr. Market has a reserve of hidden strength that will catch all the Bear's off guard. It should at least be a good fight.
 
As we stand today our equity market indicators are all relatively positive, but just like our fighter, they are battered and heading toward neutral territory. Only time, and market action, will determine if they get there. The flight to safety has caused some of my fixed income indicators to move a bit more towards positive territory, from their bearish weights. Gold and commodities stay at maximum weight.

Radiation Fears: 

A great chart that will hopefully calm some nerves out there:


Be careful out there, and keep the lights on,

Chris Wiles, CFA
412-260-7917


For prior Rockhaven Views visit:

This article contains the current opinions of the author but not necessarily those of the Rockhaven Capital Management.  The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. This article is distributed for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed.

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Once In A Lifetime


And You May Find Yourself Living In A Shotgun Shack
And You May Find Yourself In Another Part Of The World
And You May Find Yourself Behind The Wheel Of A Large Automobile
And You May Find Yourself In A Beautiful House, With A Beautiful Wife
And You May Ask Yourself-Well...How Did I Get Here?
In my 50 odd years on this planet, I know I've heard the term "once in a lifetime" at least 150 times. Here is a list of once in a lifetime events, that all happened in the past decade. Thanks to Doug Kass who put it together. As we all know they happen with much more regularity than we'd like to believe:
Black Swan events over the past decade
• Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon;
• 78% decline in the Nasdaq;
• 2003 European heat wave (40,000 deaths);
• 2004 Tsunami in Sumatra, Indonesia (230,000 deaths);
• 2005 Kashmir, Pakistan, earthquake (80,000 deaths)
• 2008 Myanmar cyclone (140,000 deaths);
• 2008 Sichuan, China, earthquake ( 68,000 deaths);
• Derivatives roil the world’s banking system and financial markets;
• Failure of Lehman Brothers and the sale/liquidation of Bear Stearns;
• 30% drop in US home prices;
• 2010 Port-Au-Prince, Haiti, earthquake (315,000 deaths);
• 2010 Russian heat wave (56,000 deaths);
• 2010 BP’s Gulf of Mexico oil spill;
• 2010 market flash crash (a 1,000-point drop in the DJIA);
• Surge of unrest in the Middle East; and
• Last Thursday’s earthquake, tsunami, nuclear event in Japan.

At times like these, when a major crisis seems to be around every corner, I often get asked, "What should I do now?"
My answer is always the same; it's too late to worry about what has happened, but it's never too late to prepare for what might happen. And anything might happen. 
When building my own investment portfolio I spent an inordinate amount of time thinking about what might go wrong. I wasn't too worried about what might go right, bull markets tend to lift all ships, I wanted to focus on risk, what could go wrong. History is full of proof that risk is "same as it ever was." 
Obviously natural disasters have always been part of living on the third rock from the sun, and they always will be. There is little we can do to protect ourselves from the wrath of mother nature, other than not living in a flood plain, or on a fault line, or in the shadow of a volcano. We can build stronger houses and buy insurance, and that will generally work, until it doesn't.
On the other hand man made disasters generally arise from greed, fear, and the quest for power. Wars, the rise and fall of countries, and financial shenanigans are the main risks to any investment portfolio. These risks may manifest themselves in inflation, deflation, currency devaluations, and bull and bear markets. 
Nearly all of us in this country were born in a period of prosperity, and subsequently are rather complacent, but it wasn't always like that. There were generations before us that suffered through rather frequent financial upheavals. They survived, but it wasn't easy. 

In building my portfolio I tried to factor in as many of these risks that I could. The goal here was hedging risks and protecting principal. 
Here is a look at my current Personal Asset Allocation:

Real Estate (Home & Vacation Condo) 18%
Global Tactical Asset Allocation Portfolio 40%
Current GTAA Allocation:
US Stocks 20%
Int'l Stocks 16%
US REITS  6%
Int'l REITS 4%
Gold  9%
Commodities 10%
US Fixed Income  9%
Int'l Fixed Income  8.5%
Cash & Foreign Currency 17.5%
Municipal Bonds 14%
Additional Gold    5%
High Yield Portfolio    3%
Miscellaneous 10%
Cash 10%
Total 100%

While I may me fairly diversified, and even though I take a very active approach to asset allocation, I'm still nervous. The essence of a surprise is that it catches you off guard. I've mentioned numerous times how my number one worry is that the US dollar is no longer the worlds reserve currency. If this were to happen, I probably don't have enough invested in international securities (currently about 40%). I also worry about a confiscatory tax of some kind. At dinner over the weekend I told some friends that I was looking into opening an account outside of the US. Nothing major, just an account. They asked why? I didn't have a specific answer, other than if the time were to come when I needed an account overseas, it would probably be too late to open one. So I'm looking. If any of you have an overseas account let me know about your experience. Many foreigners have multiple accounts around the globe, and even multiple passports, we Yanks tend to be very US centric, to a fault. Being prepared is acting before the Money's Gone.

Thoughts On Japan:



Don't buy into the BS emanating from the mouths of some so called economists, saying disasters stimulate GDP. That the rebuilding efforts in Japan will help spur economic growth. We've heard this failed logic again and again. We heard it after Katrina, and we heard it after the BP oil spill, it simply is not true. Governments can't spend their way to prosperity.
Lets look a little closer at this argument. Let's say your window breaks and you can't afford to fix it. The government rides to the rescue and pays you to fix your window. Their rationale goes something like this; we borrow the money and pay you, you hire the window repair guy, he buys a new window from the factory, and the window factory orders more glass from the glass factory. A virtual cycle of prosperity. Except at the end of the day all you have done is replace a broken window with a new window, nothing has changed. If this virtual cycle actually worked you would break every window in your house to stimulate economic growth. And why stop there, just tear down the house, or the neighborhood, or the state...just think of the growth. Disasters are not additive to growth. It's Keynesian BS that says governments can borrow and spend their way to prosperity.

There may be a more dangerous implications of the Japanese disaster than the spread of radiation leaking from their power plants...the repatriation of their liquidity. Japan is the second largest owner of US treasury securities at $886 billion (China is at $1.2 trillion). If they decide to sell some of those securities, or more likely simply let them mature and ask for their money back, someone else will have to pick up the slack. This week Portugal had a horrible 12 month bill auction that sold at a yield of 4.33%, and Belgium decided to postpone its auction of 6 year bonds. It appears that the Japanese have other uses for their money, than funding other nations deficits. 

Here is an excellent piece penned by Michael Lewis way back in 1989, that shows how little things change over time. He does an excellent job reviewing Tokyo's 1923 earthquake, and questions how prepared we can really be if we ignore so many warnings. Scary good piece: michael lewis japan quake 1989

A word on the nuclear power plants. Until control of the nukes happens, they are out of control.

Be careful out there, and keep the lights on,

Chris Wiles, CFA
412-260-7917


For prior Rockhaven Views visit:

This article contains the current opinions of the author but not necessarily those of the Rockhaven Capital Management.  The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. This article is distributed for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed.